Did the literati stop writing in SBH by the time they began writing in LBH?Can we date books to a pre-Persian period because they are written in EBH?the study of ancient texts and documents dating back to antiquity.At first, historical linguistics was comparative linguistics.Chapter 3 ( The Variation Analysis of the Hebrew Bible Corpus: The Method), the second longest chapter in the book, aims to establish the methodological framework of the study.
), proposes that a (historical) sociolinguistic variationist approach can help to clarify the relationship between Early Biblical Hebrew (EBH) and Late Biblical Hebrew (LBH) linguistic variables (e.g., as [n] or [ŋ] in Norwich, England) how a variationist analysis can be helpful for understanding language variation.
In particular, he introduces the distinction between linguistic or dependent variables on the one hand, and independent variables or factors which condition variant linguistic forms/uses on the other.
Independent variables include a speaker's/writer's age, gender/sex, social class/rank/status, region, style, etc.
After the return from exile in the late sixth century BCE, we have the era of LBH. Hebrew biblical texts can, therefore, be dated on linguistic grounds because LBH was not written early, nor did EBH continue to be written after tiie transition to LBH.
We suggest that following through the logic of this chronological approach to BH actually leads inevitably to the conclusion that all the biblical texts were composed in the postexilic period, which is exactly the opposite of what its proponents have claimed.